The Model has received strong support across the Australasian industry as it acknowledges that sometimes the organization will lead the engagement process, and sometimes the community will. And it doesn’t look ahead to what happens with a decision once it’s made. It assumes that we, as the organization, is in control and we choose a level for engagement for others on the IAP2 spectrum. Is the IAP2 Spectrum still relevant today?Īmanda Newbery, Managing Director at Articulous Communications and a certified IAP2 Engagement Trainer, shared her investigation about the relevance of the framework in the article IAP2 Spectrum – has it Reached its Use-by Date? The Engagement Triangle should be used by small groups or teams to determine the intent of the community engagement.The Triangle should be used in early stages of planning to help clarify objectives, map stakeholders and identify appropriate tools/techniques.The Engagement Triangle is a spatial tool which identifies desired outcomes of engagement based on the overarching objectives of informing decisions, building capacity and strengthening relationships.The Capire Triangle was created to help meet the following criteria: Capire have evolved the IAP2 spectrum into their own concept to assist their clients to understand the purpose of the engagement project and identify the most effective way to engage with the community. Doing a simple Consult level process for something highly complex will probably result in having to start all over again, after having done some damage.” Implementing the IAP2 spectrum into your organizational process – The Engagement TriangleĬapire Consulting Group, a specialist community engagement company, design and deliver tailored engagement strategies to build understanding, create local ownership and to inform sustainable decision making. Trying to Collaborate on something fairly straightforward, where there is little passion or complexity, would be a waste of time. It is about finding the most appropriate level. IAP2 has attempted to convey through the training, that it depends. This was never the intention and it is why the Spectrum runs left to right – so that it does not appear to be a hierarchy like Arnstein’s Ladder of Citizen Participation. The further to the right on the Spectrum the better it is. It’s a framework and a not a process guide. “You start at the left and go right. Some have misunderstood the framework completely, thinking that you start off Informing, then you Consult, then you Involve etc. Government bodies can be reluctant to establish processes at this level because of a perception that they are not permitted to delegate their decision-making authority to the public.” Common misconceptions of the IAP2 SpectrumĬollaboration specialist, Max Hardy, higlights some common missunderstandings about the IAP2 spectrum for example reading the spectrum from left to right. At this level, a decision could be made by the community through a process that requires little interaction or engagement (e.g., a referendum). “Whereas Collaborate requires a high level of community engagement, Empower does not necessarily require the same degree of community engagement. A key takeaway from his article is the “empower” level doesn’t necessarily mean it’s the highest level of engagement – even though the organization is ultimately putting the end-decision into the hands of the public. If you’re new to Public Participation, Graeme Stuart’s insightful article What is the Spectrum of Public Participation, is a helpful place to learn about the fundamentals of the Spectrum. What is the IAP2 Spectrum of Public Participation? We’d like to share a few IAP2 Spectrum reflections that we found interesting. Since the spectrum’s evolution, many reputable engagement practitioners have shared their thoughts about its effectiveness. The IAP2 spectrum includes five levels of public participation: Inform, Consult, Involve, Collaborate and Empower. The framework differentiates between the different levels of participation depending on the project goals, time frames resources and level of concern or priority. The International Association of Public Participation (IAP2) developed the Spectrum of Public Participation to help clarify the role of the public in the project planning and decision-making process.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |